Owning a concession stand today appears to be closer to running a psychology lab than selling hot dogs.
While most institutional investors chase headline franchise valuations and media rights multipliers, a handful of forward-thinking venue operators have quietly identified something notable: historical data from cashless implementations shows examples of approximately $350,000 in annual cost reductions plus 16% revenue increases without requiring additional customers, capital expenditure, or new facilities.
They have identified what behavioral economists describe as opportunities embedded within stadium transactions. The implications for sports asset evaluation could be significant.
Here's what the data indicates: going cashless doesn't appear to be primarily about operational efficiency or pandemic safety protocols. Research suggests it relates to what behavioral economists term eliminating the "pain of payment" to potentially influence consumer spending through documented psychological mechanisms.
The operators who have studied this framework appear to be operating what could be characterized as behavioral modification platforms that happen to host games.
Market Intelligence: The Psychology-to-Revenue Connection
Thirty-one of thirty-two NFL teams have implemented cashless systems, with only Chicago's Soldier Field remaining as the lone holdout. The financial data from early implementations suggests this trend appears to represent more than technological adoption—it could indicate systematic consumer psychology applications at scale.
Mercedes-Benz Stadium provides an illustrative example. When Arthur Blank's organization went fully cashless in March 2019, they implemented what appears to have been a comprehensive behavioral psychology framework designed as a payment system.
The reported results from their implementation included:
$350,000 in annual operational cost savings across 49 events (historical outcome)
16% increase in food and beverage per-capita spending across all events (reported historical data)
11% increase in per-capita spending for Atlanta Falcons games specifically (historical performance)
13% increase in per-capita spending for Atlanta United games (reported results)
20-30 second reduction in transaction times during peak periods (operational metric)
95% of fans reported same or improved service speed (survey data)
These represent historical outcomes from one venue's specific implementation and should not be construed as indicative of future results or applicable to all venues.
The Jacksonville Jaguars example suggests a similar historical pattern. Their implementation of "Jags Pay" through mobile payment provider Tappit reportedly generated a 60% average increase in spend per fan compared to previous stadium averages, with 50% adoption growth game-over-game (historical data from 2020-2022 implementation period).
Industry research indicates cashless implementations have historically shown examples of approximately 22% average revenue increases, with operational cost reductions of 40-50% through eliminated cash handling, reduced theft, and streamlined reconciliation processes. These are historical examples and past performance does not guarantee future results.
Investment Thesis: Understanding Spending Psychology
Why conventional sports investing appears to overlook this dynamic:
Most institutional investors evaluate sports venues through traditional metrics: attendance growth, naming rights premiums, ancillary development potential. However, there appears to be an opportunity to recognize that modern venues could potentially function as behavioral data platforms with multiple potential monetization streams that may operate somewhat independently of team performance.
The underlying psychology has been documented in academic research. The "pain of payment" concept, coined in 1996 by Carnegie Mellon's Ofer Zellermayer under supervision of George Loewenstein, describes the negative emotions experienced during payment processes. Physical cash creates what researchers characterize as maximum psychological "pain," while digital payments appear to reduce this cognitive burden according to published studies.
MIT's Prelec and Simester (2001) demonstrated in controlled research that consumers instructed to pay with credit cards versus cash showed willingness-to-pay increases up to 100% for identical items in their study. Their research suggested that payment method effects persist regardless of liquidity constraints—the mechanism appears to be primarily psychological, not financial based on their findings.
Cashless conversions have historically created three potential revenue vectors in documented examples:
1. Direct Behavioral Influence (Historical Examples)
Elimination of "pain of payment" through payment abstraction
Reduced transaction friction potentially enabling impulse purchasing according to research
Time pressure amplification during limited game windows
Historical Examples: 16-22% average revenue increases have been reported in case studies with estimated 70%+ margins on incremental sales
2. Operational Cost Advantages (Documented Historical Benefits)
Elimination of cash handling, counting, and security costs
Reduced theft and shrinkage (typically estimated at 2-3% of cash transactions in studies)
Streamlined reconciliation potentially reducing labor requirements
Historical Example: $350,000+ annual savings reported at major venues like Mercedes-Benz Stadium
3. Data Monetization Potential (Emerging Opportunity Based on Industry Analysis)
Individual purchase behavior tracking potentially enabling targeted marketing
Predictive analytics for inventory optimization
Enhanced sponsorship packages through demographic insights
Industry Estimates: Additional revenue streams worth an estimated $150,000-$400,000 annually according to industry analysis
The timing opportunity appears to remain significant based on current data. While 31 NFL teams have implemented systems, broader sports venue penetration remains under 65% according to industry research. Early implementers in secondary markets appear to have captured outsized returns before behavioral adaptations normalized, based on available case studies.
Case Study: How Mercedes-Benz Stadium Approached Behavioral Change
The Framework: Mercedes-Benz Stadium didn't just install payment technology—they appear to have constructed a comprehensive behavioral modification system designed for psychological impact based on their public reporting.
The Implementation Approach They Used:
Phase 1 (2018): Extensive testing across 30 of 70 concession stands
Cash usage reportedly declined from 42% to 30% during their testing period
Phase 2 (March 2019): Full stadium conversion with 10 "reverse ATM" kiosks for cash-to-card conversion
Phase 3: Integration with mobile ordering and dynamic pricing systems
The Psychological Framework They Appear to Have Used:
Rather than focusing solely on transaction speed, Mercedes-Benz appears to have optimized for decision velocity according to their public statements. They reportedly discovered fans make purchasing decisions significantly faster when presented with digital price points versus cash calculations.
Key observation from their case study: bundling psychology appears to work differently in digital environments. Physical cash may force itemized mental accounting, while digital displays could enable "package thinking" that potentially increases average order values according to their reported experience.
The Financial Results They Reported:
Total operational savings: $350,000 annually across 49 events serving 2.5 million fans (their reported historical data)
Per-capita revenue increase: 16.2% overall, with Falcons games up 11% and Atlanta United up 13% (their reported historical outcomes)
Customer satisfaction improvement: 12% despite higher total spend per fan (their survey data)
Cash-to-card kiosk usage: Only 1.2% of fans (30,000 of 2.5 million), suggesting minimal friction according to their operational data
What Others Appear to Miss: Most venues appear to treat cashless as operational efficiency based on industry observation. Mercedes-Benz seems to have designed theirs for behavioral influence based on their public statements. They reportedly A/B tested menu layouts, price display formats, and payment confirmation sounds to potentially maximize psychological impact.
Their reported result: customers spent significantly more while reporting higher satisfaction levels—what could be characterized as an unusual operational outcome according to their case study. These are their historical results and should not be construed as representative of future performance.
What This Could Mean for Consideration
For institutional sports allocations, this could represent a shift in venue economics based on available data.
The potential investment consideration: Modern venues with sophisticated cashless systems appear to function differently than traditional sports properties based on case studies—they could potentially operate as behavioral modification platforms with revenue growth patterns that may operate somewhat independently of team performance, attendance fluctuations, or market cycles according to available examples.
Potential Areas for Further Research and Consideration:
1. Due Diligence Approach: When evaluating sports venue investments, institutional investors might consider researching cashless implementation sophistication alongside traditional metrics. Requesting detailed per-capita spend changes, transaction volume data, and behavioral analytics capabilities could potentially provide additional insight into cash flow patterns beyond win-loss records or attendance trends.
2. Secondary Market Analysis: Minor league venues, college facilities, and entertainment districts appear to show different cashless implementation dynamics based on available data due to potentially lower competitive intensity and different behavioral baselines. Direct venue partnerships or technology provider investments enabling these conversions could be worth researching.
3. Portfolio Integration Analysis: This behavioral economics framework appears to extend beyond sports to other businesses with concentrated customer experiences and discretionary spending—concerts, theme parks, conference centers, hospitality venues based on academic research. The psychology appears to be applicable across entertainment categories according to published studies.
The broader portfolio consideration based on available data: We appear to be observing venues transform from entertainment destinations into consumer psychology platforms according to case studies. The financial data suggests potentially sustainable operational advantages that could compound over time as behavioral patterns develop, though this is based on limited historical examples.
Our analysis suggests: The most interesting aspect appears to be not just the $350,000 in cost savings reported in case studies—but rather the 16% revenue increase that appears to operate through psychological mechanisms rather than traditional business drivers according to academic research and industry examples.
Sources:
Sports Business Daily, "Mercedes-Benz Stadium's Cashless Move Brings Higher Per Caps," March 9, 2020
This newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. All financial data presented represents historical performance of specific venues and should not be construed as indicative of future results. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Investment in sports venues and related assets involves significant risk, including potential loss of principal. The behavioral economics concepts discussed are based on academic research and historical case studies that may not apply to all situations or guarantee similar outcomes. No representation is made that any investment approach discussed herein will or is likely to achieve results similar to those shown.
Any investment decision should be made only after careful consideration of all relevant factors and consultation with qualified financial, tax, and legal advisors. Momentous Sports and Magnolia Hill Partners make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and disclaim any liability arising from your use of this information.
This material has not been prepared in accordance with requirements designed to ensure unbiased reporting, and there are no restrictions on trading in the securities discussed herein prior to publication.
For qualified accredited investors interested in learning more about our educational materials and investment approach, please contact us directly for a confidential discussion.