Allwyn International—the multinational lottery operator behind UK's National Lottery and Illinois Lottery—just closed the biggest deal in U.S. fantasy sports history. They're paying $1.6 billion cash for 62.3% of PrizePicks, the daily fantasy sports leader that's become impossible to ignore.

Here's the deal structure:

PrizePicks is printing money:

Why this matters: Allwyn is calling this mass-market casual entertainment, not gambling—and that positioning is smart. PrizePicks pivoted to a peer-to-peer model in August 2024 after regulators started asking questions about their against-the-house offerings. The leadership team stays intact—CEO Mike Ybarra and crew keep most of their ownership, and co-founder Adam Wexler remains on the board.

Allwyn's U.S. playbook:

The investment thesis: This is regulatory arbitrage at its finest. DFS operates in a skill-based legal framework that's completely separate from traditional sports betting. With prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket blurring the lines between betting and forecasting, PrizePicks' peer-to-peer model and 45-state access creates a real moat. Management is already talking about expanding beyond sports into cultural events, music, and film predictions.

Meanwhile, the competition heats up: Apollo Global Management just launched a $5 billion Apollo Sports Capital fund (led by Al Tylis), joining Arctos Partners ($7B AUM), CVC Capital Partners, Silver Lake ($25B Endeavor acquisition), and Sixth Street in what's becoming an institutional arms race for sports assets. Apollo's permanent capital structure lets them play the long game with lending to leagues and teams, plus selective equity stakes.

Bottom line: This is Europe's biggest bet on U.S. gaming, period. The unit economics are exceptional—$339M in EBITDA shows they've figured out customer acquisition at scale. The deal proves that casual prediction gaming, not just traditional sports betting, is the next frontier for monetizing fan engagement.

The Phoenix Suns and Phoenix Mercury just announced a 10-year, $115 million naming rights deal with Mortgage Matchup—United Wholesale Mortgage's consumer-facing brand. The downtown arena is now the Mortgage Matchup Center, and it's one of the largest naming rights deals in NBA and WNBA history. But here's what makes this interesting: it's not a traditional third-party sponsor deal.

The economics:

Why this structure matters: This is vertical integration, not traditional sponsorship. Ishbia isn't extracting capital from an external sponsor—he's reallocating resources within his own portfolio to push UWM's strategic objectives. Rather than a typical arms-length negotiation, this is self-dealing in the best possible way.

What UWM gets:

The arena's identity crisis: This building can't keep a name to save its life:

The broader play: Ishbia is making moves to position Phoenix as a major sports destination—the city just hosted the 2024 WNBA All-Star Game and has the 2026 NCAA Women's Final Four and 2027 NBA All-Star Game locked in. Recent fan initiatives include a $2 value menu, free over-the-air broadcasts, FanDuel Lounge for season ticket holders, M Club by BMW at the suite level, and The Ra Ra Room from Major Food Group.

Investment angle: Owner-controlled naming rights sacrifice external capital but maximize strategic control. UWM captures brand exposure plus lead generation while the Suns/Mercury lock in 10 years of revenue certainty. This only works when the owner has a complementary business (like mortgage lending) where the consumer acquisition economics justify spending $11.5M annually on marketing.

How it compares: At $11.5M annually, this lands solidly in the top tier of NBA naming rights, though it's below mega-deals like Crypto.com Arena ($35M/year) and Chase Center ($30M/year). But UWM's strategic value from broker referrals and lead gen likely exceeds what a typical sponsor gets from pure brand awareness.

The trend: Other owner-operators like Steve Ballmer with the Intuit Dome are pursuing similar models where the ownership economics justify passing on third-party naming rights premiums in favor of strategic control.

The global players’ union FIFPRO is publicly demanding a sweeping overhaul of the club competition calendar to curb player burnout. Reuters

Takeaway: The calendar conflict is emerging as a labor flashpoint in soccer — player unions are escalating from backroom talks to public pressure, reframing scheduling as a workers’ rights issue in the sport.

Apollo Sports Capital Launch: The $5B permanent capital vehicle is targeting long-term lending to leagues and teams, led by veteran exec Al Tylis. Recent moves include an £80M loan to Nottingham Forest and discussions with Atlético Madrid around a ~€3B valuation. The strategy focuses on credit exposure with equity optionality.

NFL Private Equity Wave: Despite the August 2024 approval allowing 10% PE stakes, only 3 deals have actually closed—Arctos grabbed 10% of the Buffalo Bills and 8% of the LA Chargers, while Ares Management took 10% of the Miami Dolphins at $8.1B. But here's the thing: PE's presence drove minority stake valuations through the roof anyway. The Chicago Bears hit a record $8.9B valuation, the 49ers sold at $8.6B, the Giants are talking $10.5B, the Eagles went for $8.3B, and the Patriots are at $9B. The minority discount completely evaporated as wealthy individuals started paying premiums to compete with institutional capital.

Women's Sports Multi-Club Models: Angel City FC (Willow Bay/Bob Iger dropped $250M plus $50M in growth capital), Mercury/13 (backed by Avenue Capital targeting $100M in global deployment), and Kynisca Sports International(Michele Kang's platform spanning Washington Spirit, Olympique Lyonnais Féminin, London City Lionesses plus an Innovation Hub). An RBC/Wasserman study projects combined WNBA/NWSL valuations growing from $2.6B (2023-24) to $4.3B (2027)—that's $1.6B in value creation.

The Sponsorship Gap: Only 33 Fortune 500 companies (6%) sponsor women's leagues versus 20% for men's leagues. Women's sports revenue crossed $1B globally in 2024, up 300% from 2021. Consumer sentiment data shows +29% favorability toward women's sports sponsors versus +17% for men's sports sponsors. That's behavioral arbitrage waiting to be captured.

Sources: PrizePicks, Bloomberg, Financial Times, CNBC, Sportico, ESPN, Sports Business Journal, Phoenix Suns, RBC Wealth Management, Deloitte, MLS, and other financial news sources as cited.

This newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. All financial data presented represents historical performance of specific venues and should not be construed as indicative of future results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investment in sports venues and related assets involves significant risk, including potential loss of principal. The behavioral economics concepts discussed are based on academic research and historical case studies that may not apply to all situations or guarantee similar outcomes. No representation is made that any investment approach discussed herein will or is likely to achieve results similar to those shown. Any investment decision should be made only after careful consideration of all relevant factors and consultation with qualified financial, tax, and legal advisors. Momentous Sports and Magnolia Hill Partners make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and disclaim any liability arising from your use of this information. This material has not been prepared in accordance with requirements designed to ensure unbiased reporting, and there are no restrictions on trading in the securities discussed herein prior to publication. For qualified accredited investors interested in learning more about our educational materials and investment approach, please contact us directly for a confidential discussion.